Geoffrey Clark

Search for a person, place, crime or information

Receive updates by email

Enter your email address to subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Random Listings

  • John Hemara
    John Hemara Published 28/08/2020 on www.scoop.co.nz https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK2008/S00610/spca-prosecutes-man-for-failing-to-feed-and-care-for-his-dog.htm A Waikato man has been prosecuted by SPCA for failing to feed and care for his dog, resulting in her becoming emaciated and near death. John Hemara, who had earlier entered a guilty plea,Read …
  • Petelo Iosefa-Tamalii
    Published on www.tvnz.co.nz on 3 May 2019 https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/spca-prosecutes-auckland-man-left-dog-badly-infected-eye An Auckland man has been sentenced after he left a dog in significant pain for several months with a badly infected eye. Petelo Iosefa-Tamalii was charged with failing to ensure that anRead …
  • Jaedan Joseph Wells
    Jaedan Joseph Wells Published on nzherald.co.nz 23/03/2019 https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12215205 A sharemilker has been banned from owning animals for four years after officials discovered dairy cows under his care on a Northland farm had burst udders from untreated mastitis, and severely lameRead …
sad dog

Archives


Geoffrey Clark

Published on scoop.co.nz 24/06/2020

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK2006/S00539/spca-prosecutes-man-for-docking-puppies-tails.htm

A Christchurch man has been prosecuted by SPCA after docking the tails of two boxer puppies.

Geoffrey Clark was sentenced at the Christchurch District Court yesterday to two charges of docking the dogs’ tails. He was sentenced to a fine of $400 and ordered to pay legal costs of $150 all payable to SPCA. He was also ordered to pay $150.00 court costs.

SPCA was alerted to the case in mid-October last year after the defendant took two 10-week old Boxer puppies for vaccinations at a veterinary clinic. The puppies, one female and one male, both presented with shortened tails which appeared to be artificially docked.

SPCA CEO Andrea Midgen says there is absolutely no reason to remove a dog’s tail unless they have damaged their tail in some way.

“Tail docking is only able to be legally performed by a veterinarian or vet student under supervision, and only for therapeutic purposes, not for breed specific or cosmetic purposes.”

SPCA Inspectors visited the property of the defendant and observed the male puppy. The female puppy had been sold to a new owner. Mr Clark admitted he had docked both puppies’ tails when they were just 3 – 4 days old, and said that he believed the prohibition was not yet in place.

“These puppies suffered as a result of their home surgery procedure,” Ms Midgen says.

Mr Clark stated he had placed a plastic tube with a rubber ring over the puppies’ tails, and rolled the ring on to the tail to the desired location.

“Tail docking is illegal and people who persist using this outdated practice will be investigated with a view to prosecution,” says Ms Midgen.


Comments are closed


One Reply to “Geoffrey Clark”